Srivilliputtur Bus Stand Toilet Incident: Compensation Awarded by Virudhunagar Consumer Forum for Excess Fee Collection

The Virudhunagar District Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum recently issued a directive to the Srivilliputtur Municipal Commissioner and a contracted party overseeing a public toilet at the Srivilliputtur bus stand. This directive involves the payment of a compensation sum totaling ₹20,000, stemming from an incident in 2018, where a Watrap resident was charged an extra ₹4 for utilizing the urinal.

Srivilliputtur Municipal Commissioner and Contractor Directed to Pay Compensation

The order, dated November 18, was decreed by the presiding officer, S.J. Chakravarthi, and member M. Muthulakshmi. The directive mandates the reimbursement of the excess ₹4 to the complainant, V.V.S. Sundaram, by the contractor, Sadaiappan.

However, beyond the refund, a compensation of ₹20,000 for inflicting mental distress on the complainant and ₹10,000 to cover legal expenses must be disbursed jointly or separately by both the Commissioner and the contractor within a six-week timeframe.

Non-compliance with the directive could result in an additional 9% interest on the compensation amount, as stated by the forum.

Complaint Details and Allegations

Sundaram’s complaint outlines the ordeal of being charged ₹5 for urinal use, despite the standard rate being ₹1 for urinals and ₹2 for using the toilet facility. Moreover, he highlighted that he was ridiculed when he insisted on paying only ₹1 for using the urinal. Additionally, there was no public notice board displaying the actual charges outside the facility.

Moreover, the collector of the fee did not issue a receipt for the amount collected, further complicating the situation.

While the Commissioner defended the contractor’s adherence to regulations, asserting no prior grievances against the contractor, Sundaram maintained that the consumer complaint was legitimate and not rooted in personal animosity.

The contractor, on the other hand, claimed that Sundaram’s complaint was falsified due to a pre-existing dispute.

This incident underscores the importance of transparent fee structures and adherence to regulations in public facilities, safeguarding against such disputes and ensuring fair practices for all users.

If you are also looking for a solution to the consumer complaint, File a Complaint at Voxya, India’s Trusted platform for resolving consumer complaints. Trusted by 2 Lac+ consumers.

Consumer Forum in Hyderabad Imposes ₹15,000 Fine on Railways Due to Inoperative Air Conditioners

The District Consumer Forum in Hyderabad has ruled in favor of consumer KVS Appa Rao, directing South Central Railway (SCR) to compensate him with ₹15,000 due to the non-functioning of ACs and fans in a 3 AC compartment during a train journey from Visakhapatnam to Secunderabad on April 5, 2023.

Rao stated that despite initially complaining to the travelling ticket examiner (TTE), the issue persisted due to an electrical failure in the train. The problem was anticipated to be resolved upon reaching Eluru station, but the train arrived an hour late, exacerbating the situation. Ventilation was also insufficient, leading to discomfort and suffocation for passengers.

If you want to resolve Indian Railway Complaints, File a Complaint Now!

The train remained stationary at Vijayawada station from 4:40 am until power was restored on April 6, further intensifying the distress faced by passengers. Despite Rao’s efforts, including a letter to the railways and an RTI filing, no response or compensation was received, compelling him to file a formal complaint seeking compensation.

During the trial, the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission – II, Hyderabad, attributed negligence and a deficiency in service to the railway authorities, emphasizing the failure of the AC system and the consequential delay in the journey.

For the resolution of similar consumer complaints, a recommended course of action would be to file a complaint via Voxya, a reputable platform in India dedicated to resolving consumer grievances.

How To Resolve Complaints Against Car Manufacturers in India – Voxya

If you’ve recently purchased a car and encountered defects shortly after, there are steps you can take to address this situation legally. Firstly, it’s crucial to check the warranty papers to determine if the defects fall under the coverage. If the warranty covers the issues, you can demand a replacement of the defective parts. However, if the defects aren’t covered under the warranty and persist even after repeated attempts to resolve them with the dealer or manufacturer, legal action may be necessary.

Sending a formal legal notice to the car manufacturer or dealer is the next step. This notice should articulate the issues faced and demand either the replacement of defective parts or a refund for the car. Should you not receive a satisfactory response or any response at all, escalation to a consumer court becomes a viable option. Filing a case in a consumer court enables you to seek a refund along with compensation for the inconvenience and issues faced.

How Voxya Resolves Car Complaints?

Voxya offers a structured approach to addressing car-related complaints, utilizing various strategies to ensure consumer grievances are heard and resolved effectively:

Social Media Campaign: Voxya initiates a social media campaign to amplify consumer complaints, aiming for maximum impact and visibility.

Email Communication: It communicates with the company via email, attempting to resolve complaints amicably and swiftly.

Legal Notice Dispatch: Voxya drafts and sends a formal legal notice to the company via registered post, ensuring proper documentation of the communication process. Additionally, a copy of this notice is sent to the consumer’s address.

Consumer Court Support: Voxya assists in preparing necessary consumer case documents, and aiding consumers in filing a case in the consumer court.

Seeking resolution for car complaints through Voxya involves a systematic approach that encompasses both direct communication and legal measures, ensuring that consumers’ concerns are addressed comprehensively.

If you’re seeking a solution to a car-related complaint, you can file a complaint through Voxya’s platform here: File A Consumer Complaint.

Voxya will assist in drafting and sending the legal notice, as well as preparing the necessary consumer case documents for potential legal action in the consumer court.

Bengaluru Consumer Court Ordered Indigo Airlines to Pay ₹70,000 to Couple Over Delayed Luggage

A Bengaluru Consumer Court recently ruled in favor of a couple whose vacation in Port Blair was marred by a delay in receiving their checked-in luggage, directing Indigo Airlines to compensate them with ₹70,000.

Understanding the Ruling

Bengaluru Consumer Court presided over by President Shivarama K and members Chandrashekar S Noola and Rekha Sayannvar, concluded that Indigo had failed to provide adequate service, thereby causing distress to the couple.

Breakdown of Compensation

The court ordered Indigo to pay ₹50,000 as compensation for the inconvenience caused. Additionally, ₹10,000 was designated for the mental anguish experienced by the couple, along with an extra ₹10,000 to cover their litigation costs.

Context of the Incident

The incident traces back to November 1, 2021, when the couple booked their travel from Bengaluru to Port Blair with Indigo Airlines. However, upon arrival at their destination, they discovered that their checked-in luggage, containing vital items like clothing, medications, and ferry tickets for their Andaman boat rides, hadn’t made it to Port Blair.

Response and Legal Action

Upon realizing the issue, the couple promptly lodged a complaint with Indigo and submitted a Property Irregularity Report. The airline’s ground crew assured them that their bags would be delivered by the next day, which unfortunately didn’t materialize until November 3.

In light of the situation, on November 18, the couple took the step of sending a legal notice to InterGlobe Aviation Limited, the parent company of Indigo Airlines.

Legal Proceedings and Resolution

A year later, the couple escalated the matter to the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in Bengaluru, seeking compensation for the disruption of their vacation. Their counsel highlighted the irreversible inconvenience caused due to the delay in securing their luggage, stressing that IndiGo had concealed the fact that the luggage wasn’t loaded on the November 1 flight.

Court Verdict and Compensation Terms

The district consumer court, on September 26, partially upheld the couple’s complaint, mandating Indigo Airlines to pay ₹70,000 within 45 days. Additionally, interest at the rate of 9 percent per annum would be incurred by the airlines in case of any delay in payment.

Seeking Solutions for Airline Complaints

For individuals seeking recourse for airline-related grievances, Voxya stands as India’s reputable platform for resolving consumer complaints.

In conclusion, this ruling sets a precedent emphasizing the responsibility of airlines to ensure the timely and safe arrival of passengers’ luggage, underlining the significance of consumer rights and fair compensation for service deficiencies.

Improving Infrastructure: Tamil Nadu Consumer Protection and Environment Research Centre Advocates for Better Roads and Public Services in Tiruvarur

The Tamil Nadu Consumer Protection and Environment Research Centre in Tiruvarur has taken a proactive step by appealing to the district administration to address the deteriorating condition of the approach road leading to the new bus stand in the town. This urgent call for action stems from the persistent problems faced by commuters, particularly during the monsoon season, due to the deplorable state of the road that connects the bus stand with the Tiruchi-Nagapattinam highway.

Challenges Faced by Commuters

The condition of the road has deteriorated to such an extent that it has become a source of immense hardship for those relying on it for their daily commute. The bumpy and pothole-riddled road not only disrupts the daily lives of residents but also poses safety hazards to both pedestrians and motorists. Recognizing these issues, the Tamil Nadu Consumer Protection and Environment Research Centre is urging the district administration to prioritize the repair and maintenance of this vital transportation artery.

Ensuring Adequate Public Services

In addition to the road conditions, the centre has also brought to the forefront several other pressing concerns in Tiruvarur town. The issues related to piped drinking water connections, provided to houses under the Jal Jeevan Scheme, demand immediate attention from the district administration. The reliability of the water supply system is crucial for the well-being of the community, and it is paramount that any issues with the service are swiftly rectified.

Enhancing Public Transport

The availability of public transport services in Tiruvarur is another area of concern. The centre has raised the matter of inadequate mini-bus services, which hinder the accessibility and convenience of public transportation for residents. Furthermore, the issuance of bus tickets without the name of the operating company is a potential source of confusion for passengers. A clear and organized system of ticketing is essential to streamline the public transportation experience and ensure that passengers have access to reliable information.

Expanding Festival Season Train Services

Acknowledging the significance of the festival season in Tiruvarur, the centre passed a resolution seeking an extension of train services. Specifically, the resolution calls for the extension of train services from Tiruchi to Thanjavur and from Villupuram to Mayiladuthurai, up to Tiruvarur during this festive period. This initiative aims to accommodate the increased travel demands and provide a more convenient and efficient mode of transportation for the local population and visiting pilgrims during these important cultural events.

Conclusion

The Tamil Nadu Consumer Protection and Environment Research Centre is taking a proactive approach to address the various challenges faced by the residents of Tiruvarur. By appealing to the district administration to improve road conditions, public services, and transportation options, the centre is committed to enhancing the overall quality of life in the town. These efforts reflect the centre’s dedication to the welfare of the community and its determination to create a better and more accessible environment for all.

If you are looking for a solution to the complaint, File a Complaint at Voxya, India’s trusted consumer complaint platform for resolving consumer complaints.

Ernakulam District Consumer Commission Rules in Favor of KR Prasad in ‘Corona Rakshak’ Insurance Claim Dispute

In a significant ruling, the Ernakulam District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has issued a directive favoring KR Prasad from Muvattupuzha, instructing Star Health and Allied Insurance Company to disburse Rs 1 lakh for his Covid-19 treatment claim under the ‘Corona Rakshak’ policy. This landmark decision underscores the importance of understanding insurance policies and ensuring that policyholders receive the coverage they are entitled to.

Background of the Case

KR Prasad, a resident of Muvattupuzha, had contracted Covid-19, leading to his admission to a private hospital from January 17 to 21, 2021. His medical expenses during this period soared to Rs 2.3 lakh. At this point, he decided to make a claim under the ‘Corona Rakshak’ policy, which promised policyholders 100% coverage if diagnosed with Covid-19.

Denied Claim and Controversy

However, things took an unexpected turn when the insurance company rejected KR Prasad’s claim, contending that his medical records showed stable vitals and that his hospitalization was primarily for observation and monitoring rather than active treatment. This decision left KR Prasad in a precarious financial situation, grappling with mounting medical bills.

Commission’s Verdict

The Ernakulam District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission conducted a thorough review of the case and identified several deficiencies in the insurance company’s service and identified unfair trade practices. The commission emphasized that the ‘Corona Rakshak’ policy was explicitly designed to provide comprehensive coverage for Covid-19, a condition that KR Prasad met by being hospitalized for over 72 hours due to the virus.

Compensation and Justice

In its ruling, the commission ordered Star Health and Allied Insurance Company to disburse Rs 1 lakh to KR Prasad, fulfilling his claim for Covid-19 treatment expenses. In addition to this reimbursement, the commission also instructed the insurance company to pay a compensation of Rs 10,000 to KR Prasad, recognizing the emotional and financial stress he had endured during this ordeal.

Moreover, the commission demanded that the insurance company cover KR Prasad’s litigation expenses, amounting to Rs 10,000. This comprehensive verdict ensures that KR Prasad receives not only financial reimbursement for his medical expenses but also compensation for the distress he endured due to the claim rejection.

Importance of Understanding Policy Terms

This case serves as a poignant reminder of the importance of understanding the terms and conditions of insurance policies thoroughly. Policyholders need to be aware of their rights and obligations to ensure they receive the coverage they deserve, especially during a global health crisis like the Covid-19 pandemic.

In conclusion, the Ernakulam District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission’s verdict in favor of KR Prasad highlights the significance of upholding the promises made by insurance policies. It stands as a beacon of hope for policyholders, assuring them that they can seek redress when their legitimate claims are unjustly denied. This landmark ruling serves as a testament to the importance of accountability and justice in the world of insurance.

If you are also looking for a solution to the consumer complaint, File a Complaint at Voxya Now!

India’s trusted platform for resolving consumer complaints, It helps consumers to get a replacement, refund, and compensation quickly.

Trusted by 2 Lac+ consumers.

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Ordered Birla Sun Life Insurance Company to Compensate the Grieving Widow with ₹5 Crore

In a significant legal judgment, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has deemed a repudiation letter issued by an insurance company as illegal and, consequently, ordered the disbursement of a substantial sum amounting to ₹5 crore, in addition to an interest totaling approximately ₹4 crore, to a Kandivali woman. The woman in question, Dipti Parekh, had seen her late husband’s life insurance claim rejected by the insurance company. The rejection was ostensibly based on discrepancies surrounding the insured individual’s date of birth and an alleged failure to provide necessary information pertaining to his medical history and prior claim denials.

The unfortunate incident leading to this legal battle unfolded in the aftermath of Dipti Parekh’s husband, Yogesh Parekh, experiencing chest pain and eventually passing away in 2014. The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, in its wisdom, found that the incorrect year of birth played a pivotal role in this dispute. The insurance company in question, Birla Sun Life Insurance Co Ltd, had evidently imposed a higher premium due to the inaccuracies related to Yogesh’s date of birth. Furthermore, the claim denial was primarily attributed to alleged inaccuracies within the proposal form. Yogesh had allegedly responded negatively to queries concerning his health, which were subsequently determined to be inaccurate.

For those who find themselves entangled in similar consumer disputes and seek a resolution, there exists a viable avenue for recourse. By filing a complaint through Voxya, a trusted platform in India specializing in consumer complaint resolution, aggrieved individuals can expedite the processes of securing replacements, refunds, and compensation.

In light of this groundbreaking decision, it is apparent that consumer rights continue to be vigorously upheld by the relevant authorities. This case serves as a reminder that insurance companies are obliged to handle claims fairly and in accordance with the stipulated terms and conditions, ensuring that beneficiaries are not unduly burdened by discrepancies or errors that may have arisen through no fault of their own.

Bangalore Consumer Forum Order Wedding Photographer To Pay Rs.20,000 For Deficiency in Services

In a recent ruling, the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (DCDRC) in Bangalore delivered a decisive verdict, underscoring the significance of delivering exceptional service in the wedding photography industry. The case involved a wedding photographer who, despite receiving full payment, failed to provide the wedding CD video to the client. Let’s delve into the details and explore the implications of this ruling.

Photographer’s Unfulfilled Promise

The Bangalore Consumer Forum, presided over by President M Shobha and members K Anita Shivakumar and Suma Anil Kumar, found the photographer’s actions unfair to the couple, deeming it a deficiency of service. Wedding photographs and videos hold immense sentimental value, and failing to provide the CD of the complainant’s wedding was considered unjust. The commission ruled that by accepting the entire payment for photography and video coverage, the photographer had a contractual obligation to fulfill his assurances. Consequently, the commission ordered the photographer to compensate the aggrieved party with ₹20,000, plus interest at a rate of 10% from March 5, 2021, the wedding date when the substantial payment was made.

The Complainant’s Experience

The complainant had engaged the photographer’s services for her wedding on March 5, 2021, agreeing to a total payment of ₹80,000 for both a photo album and video coverage on a CD. She made an initial payment of ₹5,000 on January 15, 2021. It was mutually agreed that the remaining amount would be paid on the wedding day, with the delivery of the photo album and CD to follow.

However, despite the wedding having occurred, and the full payment of ₹80,000 made, the photographer made no effort to provide the CD. Frustrated by the photographer’s lack of response, the complainant resorted to sending a legal notice, which went unanswered, leading to her complaint before the district forum. The complainant sought compensation for mental anguish, hardship, and litigation costs amounting to ₹2 lakh.

Photographer’s Defense

During the proceedings, the photographer claimed that he had promised to deliver the CD within 15 days but had encountered challenges related to editing and the availability of editors. However, he failed to present any substantial evidence to support his claim that the couple still owed him ₹65,000.

The Commission’s Stance

Bangalore Consumer Forum emphasized the irreplaceable nature of wedding memories and stressed that, if the photographer had already prepared the CD, it was his responsibility to deliver it promptly, along with compensation. Memories of a marriage are priceless and cannot be recreated. In the event that the photographer was unable to produce the CD, the commission ruled that he must refund the amount received for the CD, after deducting the expenses incurred for photography and the album.

In conclusion, this ruling by the Bangalore Consumer Forum serves as a reminder to professionals in the wedding photography industry and any service-oriented business. Upholding commitments and delivering on promises is crucial to maintain trust and customer satisfaction. This case underscores the significance of honoring agreements and ensuring that customers’ precious moments are preserved and cherished.

If you find yourself facing a consumer complaint, don’t hesitate to seek resolution. File a complaint with Voxya to address your grievances promptly and efficiently. Your satisfaction and peace of mind matter.

Namakkal Consumer Forum Ordered Nationalised Bank to Compensate Customer ₹1.64 Lakh for Exorbitant Interest Deduction

The Namakkal District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (DCDRC) has taken decisive action against a nationalised bank for unjustly deducting exorbitant interest from a customer’s account, ruling in favor of the complainant, K. Santhakumar (56), an entrepreneur from Pollachi in Coimbatore. This incident dates back to 2012 when Mr. Santhakumar couldn’t pay his credit card bill amounting to ₹ 6,737. Fast forward to December 2017, and he had a healthy balance of ₹ 1.71 lakh in his account. Unfortunately, things took a turn when he issued a cheque of ₹ 1.50 lakh to someone, leading to its bounce due to insufficient funds. Upon realizing the deduction of ₹ 96,410 from his account by the bank as a result of the credit card bill non-payment, Mr. Santhakumar sought answers from the bank officials, but their response proved inadequate and unsatisfactory.

Determined to seek justice, Mr. Santhakumar filed a consumer complaint with the Coimbatore Consumer Court in 2018, and later, the case was transferred to the Namakkal Consumer Forum in July 2022.

Calculating Fair Compensation – Namakkal District Consumer Forum Verdict

On a fateful Tuesday, District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Commissioner V. Ramaraj delivered a decisive verdict, exposing the bank’s unfair practices. The commission found that the bank had applied an unreasonable interest rate while deducting the amount. The bank should have appropriately deducted only ₹ 11,410 for the credit card bill, considering the original amount of ₹ 6,737 with an annual interest rate of 6%. Therefore, the bank must now provide the remaining ₹ 85,000 to the customer, compounded with 6% interest per year, starting from December 2017. This amounts to ₹ 29,000, which should be paid within four weeks.

Compensation for Deficiency in Service and Mental Agony

Apart from rectifying the interest deduction, the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission also recognized the inconvenience and mental agony caused to Mr. Santhakumar due to the bank’s actions. As a consequence, the bank has been directed to compensate him with an additional ₹ 50,000. This compensation serves as redress for the deficiency in service and the emotional distress caused to the customer.

Upholding Consumer Rights and Fair Banking Practices

The recent ruling by the Namakkal District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission emphasizes the significance of safeguarding consumer rights and fair banking practices. Such decisions act as a strong deterrent to financial institutions engaging in unjust practices that adversely affect their customers. As the backbone of a thriving economy, banks and financial institutions must adhere to transparent and ethical conduct, fostering trust and mutual respect with their customers.

Conclusion

The Namakkal Consumer Forum directive to the Nationalised Bank to compensate Mr. Santhakumar with ₹ 1.64 lakh for an exorbitant interest deduction reflects a resolute commitment to uphold consumer rights and enforce fair banking practices. This ruling serves as a reminder to financial institutions that they must prioritize their customers’ well-being and adhere to the highest standards of service and transparency. By doing so, banks can foster trust and loyalty among their clientele, contributing to a healthier financial ecosystem where both banks and customers can thrive.

Are you also looking for a solution to a consumer complaint, File A Complaint in Consumer Court Now!

Madurai Consumer Forum Ordered Private Dental Clinic Ordered to Pay Rs 10 Lakh Compensation for Medical Negligence

In a recent ruling by the Madurai District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, a private dental clinic has been held accountable for medical negligence and ordered to pay a compensation of Rs 10 lakh. This decision comes after a tragic incident where a patient’s life was lost due to the clinic’s improper tooth extraction without conducting any necessary tests.

Background

The incident took place in Madurai city when Suresh alias Swarna, the husband of Petchiammal alias Baby, experienced severe toothache. He was promptly taken to a private clinic located on Munichalai Road on December 24, 2017. Shockingly, without performing any medical tests, the clinic proceeded to extract his tooth. Subsequently, Suresh began to feel weak and eventually collapsed. Realizing the gravity of the situation, the clinic rushed him to another private hospital. Unfortunately, despite their efforts, Suresh was declared dead at Government Rajaji Hospital.

The Petition and Investigation

Petchiammal, in her petition, held the dental clinic responsible for her spouse’s untimely demise. According to her claims, the clinic’s negligence and failure to conduct essential medical procedures before the tooth extraction led to the fatal outcome. The Madurai Consumer Forum, chaired by President N Pari, alongside members KA Vimala and K Velumani, carefully examined the evidence presented.

The Verdict

The postmortem report confirmed that the extraction of the tooth directly contributed to Suresh’s death. Alarming information also came to light during the investigation: the dentist responsible for the procedure had obtained their license on February 23, 2017, indicating limited experience in the field. The clinic’s management failed to provide sufficient evidence to support the claim that all necessary protocols were followed before the extraction.

Hence, the Madurai Consumer Forum held the clinic accountable for the tragic loss of life and ruled in favor of Petchiammal. The management has been instructed to pay a compensation of Rs 10 lakh within three months. Failure to comply within the given timeframe will result in an additional 9% annual interest being levied on the amount.

Ensuring Accountability for Medical Negligence

This ruling by the Madurai District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum highlights the importance of accountability in the healthcare industry. Patients place their trust in medical professionals and expect them to adhere to the highest standards of care. Instances of medical negligence, such as the one discussed, not only lead to devastating consequences for the individuals involved but also erode public trust in healthcare providers.

It is crucial for clinics, hospitals, and practitioners to prioritize patient safety and ensure that all necessary tests and procedures are carried out before undertaking any medical intervention. Furthermore, regular training, skill development, and upholding strict licensing requirements are essential to maintain the highest standards of care.

Conclusion

The Madurai Consumer Forum’s verdict on the case involving the private dental clinic emphasizes the significance of adherence to proper medical protocols and the consequences of negligence. By ordering the clinic to compensate Petchiammal with Rs 10 lakh, the forum aims to bring justice to the affected family and deter similar instances of medical malpractice. This ruling serves as a reminder for healthcare providers to prioritize patient well-being, maintain the highest standards of care, and uphold the trust bestowed upon them by their patients and the community at large.

If you are also looking for a solution to the complaint, File a Complaint Now!